30 September 2008

Not Playin' Nice

It's become desperately obvious that the "journalists" in the misnamed "mainstream media" (which I will foreverafter refer to as the "mad-scream muddy-ya" or something similarly derogatory), as well as the consistantly ignorant fucks in Hollyweed have abandoned ANY pretense of impartiality and have decided to no longer even try to "play nice".

So be it.

First out of the block is further proof of the eternal link between leftists and socialist Nazis.
Yes, I did write "NAZIs", since that word is a contraction for the German "Nationale Sozialistische Partei".
The Hitler Youth sang anthems to "der Führer".
The kids of the DPRK similarly sing hymns to their "Dear Leader" - Kim Jong-Il.
Remember Elian Gonzalez, who preferred Castro to his mother's family in Florida?
How about all those communist Chinese with their little display of "unity" during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics?
I will NOT embed the code for the video at the following link, but you can go there if you choose to see the latest glassy-eyed cherubs drooling their undying devotion to the latest messiah of the socialist Nazi's - barack hussein obama:

That shit is so disturbing on so many levels that it transcends disgust and goes straight to Jonestown.

But it doesn't end with just the bo-toxic shit-for-brains pukes of HollyWeed.
The next stop on this tour of drooling insanity are those paragons of negotiable ethics....
...you know 'em, you love 'em...

I'm just going to post the following, it's from a daily NewsMax email subscription I get, and I don't have time to hunt down the link to the actual story:

CBS, ABC Distort Sarah Palin Interview
It is a tale of two con jobs.

As outlined in my previous LCR, ABC’s Charles Gibson interview of Sarah Palin was questionably edited. Now CBS has followed suit with the Katie Couric interview of the GOP vice presidential candidate.
A pattern of distortion has emerged. Both ABC and CBS cut answers by Palin; answers that would have indicated a more nuanced approach to foreign policy when it comes to the issue of multilateral diplomacy.
In the Couric interview, Palin answered a question that dealt with what the U.S. should do to convince Pakistan to take a harder line against terrorists.
“At a time when new leadership comes in, that is the opportunity to forge better, tighter, more productive relationships and that’s what we’ll take advantage of with new leadership in the U.S. and in Pakistan. And I’m sure that President Zardari, too, will agree with us as we commit to the support that Pakistan needs, that other nations in the region need, in order to win this war on terrorism,” Palin responded.
This question and answer were edited out.
Could it be that Palin’s response did not serve CBS’s desired post-interview spin?

When Couric inquired about the implementation of democracy in other parts of the world, Palin answered, “Well, one is that America cannot be counted on to do this solely, to be the savior of every other nation, but we need friends and we need allies and we need this nation-building effort and we need to forge new alliances, and that is what a new election will provide opportunity to do.”
This response, too, was withheld from the public.
Could it be once again that CBS did not find the response to be consistent with the hawkish image of Palin that mainstream media are trying to cloak her with?

Similarly, Couric asked about instances when a democracy does not produce the desired outcome, such as in the election of Hamas.

“Especially in that region, though, we have got to protect those and support those who do seek democracy and do seek protections for the people who live there. And you know, we’re seeing today, in the last couple of days here in New York, a speaker, a president of Iran, Ahmadinejad, who would come on our soil and express such disdain for one of our closest allies and friends—Israel—and we’re hearing the evil that he speaks . . .

"If hearing him doesn’t allow Americans to commit more solidly to protecting the friends and allies that we need, especially there in the Mideast, then nothing will,” Palin responded.

“If Americans are not waking up to understand what it is that he represents, then nothing is going to wake us up and we will be lulled into some kind of false sense of security that perhaps Americans were a part of before 9/11,” she added.
Again CBS editors snipped away.

ABC News cut similar content from the Gibson interview.

Intelligent, thoughtful, reasoned responses edited out? Beyond shameful, this represents the utter corruption of the Fourth Estate.

The New Media thankfully ride to the rescue"

Need I say more?

Okay, how about the "moderator" of the up-coming VicePresidential debate - another shining example of (taxpayer-supported!) "unbiased journalism" from the PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM (otherwise known as the Pro-Barack System)! - one gwen ifill, scheduling the release of HER BOOK ABOUT barack hussein obama for just about the time of the next Presidential Inauguration!!!

JAY-EEZUS AITCH KEE-RAIST! Can they kiss democrat ass any harder and deeper?


Seem's that it's not JUST cross-eyed, dit-brained AMERICANS who want his pandering ass in the Oval office...there are a whole lot of FOREIGN INVESTORS who are ponying up BIG money - literally MILLIONS OF DOLLARS! - to see the empty suit elected.

Are there no real journalists left who might ask one question:

If that pandering, two-faced, liberalite sack of shit gets his worthless ass elected to the White House, there's only one thing I can say to the pus-for-brains oxygen-thieves who voted for him:
"Don't whine when America goes to hell. That IS what YOU voted for....


MK said...

Liberals rejected the real God, so now they're ripe to be taken over by some fruitcake, empty suits will do just as well too.

"Can they kiss democrat ass any harder and deeper?"

Probably not, but that won't stop em' from trying Touch.

MK said...

Their man cannot win without the help of the Media Touch, just not possible. He knows it, they know it, we all know it, it remains for Americans to decide whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.